Deviant Paradigm: Of The Wolf Within
Random garbage. Remarks about the comic Deviant Paradigm, notes about my life, comments about politics. This is my place to rant and rave. Fear this, World! FEAR IT!


Nickname: Avvy
Age: 24
See My Complete Profile

Technomancer and troubleshooter by trade. Programmer by choice. Creator of Deviant Paradigm, somewhat by accident.

The Last Ten

Worrisome Signs
Big Time Drunken Debauchery
"I hate voice actresses for no reason."
Growling at Firefox
The Internet -- But It Tastes So Good!
Die Intarwebbzen ist mein!
The Time of Reemergence Draws Near
A Full Weekend, Full Tilt
Moving Status
Fire In The Blood


October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
July 2009


The Big Gay Post

Halloween Party: Images 2005

Deviant Paradigm
Deviant Paradigm: Beware of Catgirl

Semper Nox Noctis
Semper Nox Noctis: Memoirs of the OverAlpha 1


Deviant Paradigm
--My Webcomic--


Enea Volare Mezzo
-- Sapph's Blog --

Events Concerning...
-- Jonathan and Luke's Blog --

Fear No Darkness...
-- Jamie's Blog --

Little Green Footballs
-- My source for political news !!Conservative Site Alert!! --

Random Webcomic

Friday, June 30, 2006

The Coming Battles
For those of you who have been paying attention, do you wonder if the NY Times are going to see a court over the SWIFT surveillance? I'm thinking that they are going to want to push this to the SCOTUS and see exactly how far they can go with "freedom of the press." Who loses? Everyone. If this happens, we all lose. Because the Times have gone too far this time, and pushed into the realm of possible treason. So if they win, "freedom of the press" essentially makes the press omnipotent, with no one checking or balancing them. They just get to do whatever they want. I've always suspected that the Media was playing their own side in the ideological war, so this makes sense to me that they'd try for this. But if the NY Times loses, we're going to have popular discontent, because they'll treat it like we're destroying the Constitution because we think it might be handy if they would keep their mouths shut when they hear about legal, well-regulated counter-terrorism operations that they themselves suggested the US undertake.

And the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is heating up. The Palestinians have kidnapped an Israeli soldier (from inside of Israel) during a raid. Now the Israelis are going in, guns blazing, to get him out. The Palestinians, meanwhile, have abducted and murdered other Israelis and now claim to have fired chemical weapons into an Israeli town. I've heard rumors that the Palestinians are also claiming to have a stockpile of biological weapons that they are threatening to use. Now I have already stated that the Palestinians have, on every possible occaision, demonstrated that they are all-time worst people to give self-governance to, but this reaches an absolutely remarkable new level of sheer stupidity. What they are trying to do is give Israel an indisputable casus belli that the rest of the world can't even debate. A strong enough one for Israel to, as I believe Hamas put it, "wipe the map." Hamas is calling what they've recently done "acts of war." Perhaps they would be wise to remember that Israel tends to win its wars in less than a week. And they do things like win wars in a week and double the size of the country. If it wasn't so risky, the situation would go like this: Palestinians fire biological weapons at Israel causing grevious casulties, including among themselves because, hey, it's not a Palestinian rocket unless it kills at least three of their own. Gaza becomes a shiny strip of glass and the "West Bank" is moved inland a few hundred miles, as what we now call the West Bank is now a sea-filled crater. The longer this goes on, the less I am inclined to feel sympathy for the Palestinians in their endless quest for self-destruction via proxy. And I never was a sympathetic man in the first place.

Should be interesting to see how these things end up.


  • At 3:11 PM, July 03, 2006, Blogger DerImpresario said…

    The most fascinating part is the words each side chooses to use. Israel is very cautious about even referring to the "kidnapping", as they call it, as an "act of war" (as Hamas calls it). Which begs the question - is it war, or is it not?

    58 years ago, the newly-minted nation stood against every single one of their neighbors. They were surrounded by hostiles or the Mediterranean. Their neighbors expected total victory and vicious genocide. Instead, they were decisely defeated. This was repeated twice more. But ever since the 6-Day War, Israel has responded to enemy aggression - a very deliberate choice of words on my part - with both hands tied behind their backs and blindfolds on. Ever since the mid-70s, Israel went from a "plucky little nation" to the world's greatest villain in the Mideast. While this is an "escalation," unless Olmert does something truly staggering, the familiar pattern of the last 30 years will continue. I admit to great ignorance regarding Olmert, but I am not confident.

    Using my (non-existent) psychic powers, it is my guess that Shalid will probably be found dead, the IAF will destroy more abandoned buildings in "symbolic" strikes, the IDF will withdraw back to Israel, the usual round of recrimination and condemnation will go around, the rockets will continue to fire, and life will continue as it has for the last three decades.


Post a Comment

<< Home

Layout From * shadowmist Mangled And Modified By * Avvy
Get awesome blog templates like this one from